Johns Hopkins neurosurgeon and Seventh-day Adventist Dr. Benjamin Carson spoke today at the National Prayer Breakfast in Washington D.C., sharing his views on health care, national debt, and political correctness. This is his second time as speaker at the National Prayer Breakfast, and perhaps it will be his last, as he offered some bold opinions. You can watch his speech here:
End of Saturday mail delivery good news for Sabbath keepers
U.S. Postmaster General Patrick Donahoe announced the end of Saturday mail delivery today, which would save two billion dollars a year. The decision would not affect package delivery. Union leaders were angered, calling for his resignation. The North American Religious Liberty Association thought this was "great news for Adventists and people who keep Sabbath throughout the United States." Read their statement below.
In what Seventh-day Adventist Church Associate Counsel Todd McFarland hailed as "great news for Adventists and people who keep Sabbath throughout the United States," the U.S. Postal Service announced today that it would cease Saturday mail delivery beginning August 1. Saturday package delivery will continue, and post offices will remain open on Saturdays, but with reduced hours.
The move was motivated by tens of billions of dollars in losses in recent years, and should save the agency about $2 billion a year. However the decision has a positive, albeit unintended, consequence as well.
"For decades the USPS has been the single most troublesome employer for those seeking Sabbath workplace accommodation. Halting Saturday delivery will not only prevent many future Sabbath observance conflicts for Adventists employed by the post office, but will help resolve current situations in which mail carrier-church members are experiencing discrimination," said McFarland.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission reports that job discrimination complaints continue to grow at an alarming rate in the United States, with charges based on religious discrimination jumping by 9.5 percent in 2011, the largest increase of any category.
Pastors urge NPUC to end its one-sided campaign for women's ordination
A group of 28 pastors in the North Pacific Union Conference (NPUC) launched a website called OrdinationTruth.com today, asking the NPUC leadership to "stand down from the proposed special constituency session," which will push women's ordination.
On January 30, 2013, the pastors issued a letter to NPUC President Max Torkelsen III, calling out the pro-women's ordination bias of the Gleaner. Nov. 14, 2012, the NPUC Executive committee voted to "inform and educate members of the rationale toward biblical church leadership without regard to gender; 2) engage and encourage constituents in structured conversation and discussion on women in ministry," but since the NPUC has offered only one perspective, the letter goes on to announce that OrdinationTruth.com will be launched to ensure that "alternative views can be shared with NPUC readers." The letter ends with the group's request that the NPUC Executive Committee rescind its action to hold a special constituency meeting.
We respectfully ask that the NPUC Executive Committee rescind its action to hold a special constituency meeting. Let the 2015 General Conference in session respond by official vote to the recommendations to be offered by the 2014 Annual Council's action regarding the Theology of Ordination Study Committee, and let the North Pacific Union Conference leadership and constituents lend that decision of the world church whatever it is its full support.
You can read their news release here:
North Pacific Union Conference (NPUC), North American Division, February 4, 2013: Today the NPUC Supporting Pastors launched the OrdinationTruth.com website. At launch, twenty-eight ministers formally lent their support, choosing to be named and listed as Supporting Pastors. As more pastors learn of this encouragement toward unity, it is anticipated the list will speedily grow.
Those within the Union advocating in favor of Women’s Ordination are preparing for a special constituency meeting of the Union where NPUC could move ahead of the world church. The Supporting Pastors came together to respond to this emergency. They respectfully ask that the NPUC Executive Committee rescind its November 2012 decision and that no special constituency meeting to act on Women’s Ordination be held before the 2015 General Conference session.
In 2012, two of nine North American Division union constituencies voted to act independently of the world Seventh-day Adventist Church (SDA). Those two unions moved unilaterally to ordain women as pastors. The SDA Church rejected similar initatives in 1990 and 1995 General Conference sessions. In Adventist polity, an ordained minister carries authority to function across the world field. Union conferences do not have authority to determine whether women shall be ordained within their territories; this decision rests with the combined Church represented by the General Conference. A group within the NPUC also launched a union-wide initiative intended to lead to a special meeting. But such action at this time could align the North Pacific Union with other insubordinate unions.
OrdinationTruth.com is intended as a fresh venue where information can be shared highlighting Christian teachings about unity, order, and gender in the Church. The site also exists to help assure that the conversation about Women’s Ordination in the Union is balanced. The Union paper has carried only one side of the question. Immediately, and in weeks and months to come, OrdinationTruth.com will carry news, articles, and studies addressing questions of unity and Women’s Ordination, especially within the territory of the NPUC. There is also an e-mail list where interested persons can participate as the situation unfolds. For these materials, more detailed positions, and participation options, persons are directed to http://www.OrdinationTruth.com.
Initially published documents include an overview document as well as, “Ordination: God’s Purpose versus Satan’s Designs,” found in the FEATURES section of the site.
The NPUC Supporting Pastors seek to work in harmony with the NPUC and invite prayer for Union leadership and support for the world church in this difficult hour.
# # # The Seventh-day Adventist Church is a Protestant Christian denomination of 17 million members operating in 230 nations. The NPUC (North Pacific Union) Supporting Pastors are Seventh-day Adventist ministers called to serve in Alaska, Washington, Oregon, Upper Columbia, Idaho, and Montana conferences. In particular, they are led to give voice to the understanding of Seventh-day Adventists who (1) seek to work in harmony with the world church as represented by the General Conference, and/or (2) who cannot conscientiously support as an appropriate practice Women’s Ordination in the present situation. NPUC Supporting Pastors recognize the General Conference of the Seventh-day Adventist Church located in Silver Spring, Maryland, USA as the ultimate organizational authority within SDA polity.
The shame of it all
If we step over the line of God’s Law, He (in His mercy) allows three consequences into our lives: guilt, shame, and fear. They each have a purpose; first I'll write about shame.
I am fascinated by the casual comment that closes chapter two of Genesis. “The man and his wife were both naked, and they felt no shame.” With this comment, Moses drops a pin marker in pre-fall paradise and then moves into the story of sin in chapter three. Here we see disgrace for the first time (v. 7), and they weren’t glorying in it either (Philippians 3:19).
When the flush of forbidden excitement faded into monochrome reality, Adam & Eve first saw themselves in the cold light of conviction. They were not just naked; they were now the raw edge of genetic vulnerability. And they were... ashamed. It was a flashing “check heart” light on the dashboard of their tender conscience.
Six thousand years later (give or take a week), we seem to have entered a different time in history. Shame is no longer an approved tool in society's toolbox. And it’s actually a shame. Shame can keep people from making many dumb decisions.
The self-esteem movement of the 1960’s has given birth to a world without concern for behavior or excellence. I really like a quote I heard recently: “They keep inventing new ways to celebrate mediocrity.” For instance, an international math test found that although American students ranked low in skills, they were at the top of the world when it came to believing that they were good at math. As David McCullough said last year in his Wellesley Massachusetts High School commencement speech, “Today’s B was yesterday’s C.”
In Western culture, the self-esteem movement has essentially become the anti-shaming movement, and now wants us to feel good about everything. But it isn’t good to feel good about bad things, is it? We tend to call that psychopathic behaviour.
Here’s another example of anti-shame. Last year, a Children’s Hospital in Georgia started a campaign to reduce childhood obesity. They released several nice videos and put up numerous billboards with real-life overweight children talking about the real-life problems that obesity causes.The videos (watch them on YouTube) are presented with neither judgment nor excessive dramatization. But, now there is a campaign to have the Children’s Hospital take down these billboards! The belief is that these billboards bring shame to children who are obese. I don’t agree that these apropos billboards are making kids ashamed, but if they are it could become a good thing (40% of children in Georgia are overweight). Excess fat endangering our life should make us ashamed. It should be noted that excess fat covering their bodies also makes them ill, and it’s much easier to die of diabetes or heart disease than of shame.
Anyone sensible can see that the Georgia Children's Health Alliance wasn’t bringing shame to children; they simply acknowledged the fact that children were already feeling ashamed and that one of the many side effects of obesity is that our (get ready for it) self-esteem takes a dive. And we can’t have that.
Anti-shame has (as intended) produced a steady stream of shamelessness. Bad grades? No shame. Bad behavior? Don’t be ashamed. Immorality? No shame. No restraints, and no humility.
Thus today we have people bursting out of closets all over the place. In place of the ever popular No Fear™ Tee-shirts, we have their seamy cousin–No Shame. And I think that’s a shame.
It may come as a shock to you, but there was once a time when personal failures, deviant desires, and perverse taste were accompanied by shame and embarrassment, or at least by silence. Today these deviations are a ticket to have your own reality show, and/or maybe a book deal.
What then is the purpose of shame? If there’s one thing I’ve learned it is that shame can play a wonderful role in a civilized society. Shame helps keeps us from behaving badly (or should). To be immune to the disapproval of loved ones would hack a great piece out of what it is to love. The absence of shame is often seen around criminal and immoral activity. The opposite of shame is not goodness; the opposite of shame is shamelessness and the connotation there is not pretty. Bring back shame. It should be a national sport. A good dose of healthy shame could fix a great many ills.
What about the Bible? The Bible has much to say about shame. It defines a healthy kind and a bad kind. One bad kind occurs when others intentionally embarrass us. That’s not fun, is it? In this category I will also put false shame, when the Enemy tries to discourage & damage our relationship with God. False shame is a pipeline for negative thoughts. Perhaps we’ll talk about that kind in another article.
We receive the right kind of shame when we transgress God’s Law, as did Adam & Eve. This shame is meant to bring us to repentance. Shame, therefore, is appropriate. But it need not be permanent, for as Paul tells us in Romans, where there is hope we are not ashamed, and through Christ we are provided hope (Romans 5:5). You and I need Jesus to take our burdens and our shame away. He is willing, if we are.
Therefore I see the current anti-shame culture that surrounds us as a mortal enemy of repentance. Anti-shame is not interested in surrendering our burdens to Jesus; it just denies that sin and guilt exist at all. It has a precedent in the Bible, and the results can be devastating.
“The LORD is righteous in her midst, He will do no unrighteousness. Every morning He brings His justice to light; He never fails, but the unjust knows no shame” (Zephaniah 3:5). This verse reveals the contrast between God’s goodness (which leads us to repentance) and a conscience seared. It’s a type of anti-shame, and here’s an even better verse: “Whose end is destruction, whose God is their belly, and whose glory is in their shame, who mind earthly things” (Philippians 3:19). Now we have a people who are continuing to do wrong and receiving worldly accolades for their shameful ways. In this kind of world, carnality is king. If this looks familiar to you, that is because it is describing our current world condition. Have mercy on us, O Lord.
I close this article with two scriptural causes for the contemporary quagmire of anti-shame.
- Spiritual drunkenness. Just as alcohol causes people to lose shame, the wine of Babylon is removing the inhibitions of Earth’s inhabitants (Jeremiah 51:7; Rev. 14:8).
- Fighting reality. Calling good good and evil evil cultivates the right kind of shame. Calling evil good and good evil is the combustion engine of anti-shame (Isaiah 5:20) and pride is its deep-cycle battery.
Were they ashamed when they had committed abomination? nay, they were not at all ashamed, neither could they blush: therefore they shall fall among them that fall: at the time that I visit them they shall be cast down, saith the LORD. Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. — Jeremiah 6:15-16
ADvindicate celebrates its one-year anniversary as website traffic increases
Time has whirled by, and it’s hard to believe a whole year has passed since ADvindicate launched Feb. 2, 2012. God has blessed beyond expectations. Due to its staff and guest contributors, ADvindicate published 172 articles with a monthly readership average in the last six months of almost 6,000.
News stories have played the most significant role in doubling ADvindicate’s traffic the last six months. It published 54 news stories of which 33 percent were original. Plans are in place to double its journalistic efforts, so be on the lookout for more news.
People from 162 countries/territories visit ADvindicate. While the United States far exceeds any other country/territory for traffic, ADvindicate still receives a significant number of hits from Canada, Australia, United Kingdom, South Africa and the Philippines. Its top five cities are Los Angeles, San Francisco, Loma Linda, New York City and Riverside. The top two referral sites are Facebook and Spectrum Magazine.
The staff at ADvindicate pray its readers have been blessed. ADvindicate started from an idea to see bible-based Seventh Day Adventist views promoted, but it's still relatively small in the world of independent Adventist websites, so thank you to the thousands who continue to share ADvindicate’s content via email, Facebook or word of mouth.
Statistics are based on Google Analytics
Having faith in God while waiting
“Wait on the LORD: be of good courage, and he shall strengthen thine heart: wait, I say, on the LORD.” – Psalm 27:14
Wait on the Lord. Waiting is one of life's most difficult challenges. Impatience is a common thread in the history of humanity, and in today's fast-paced society addicted to instant gratification, waiting even just a little bit has become agonizing. We often grow tired of waiting and either give up whatever it was we were waiting for or try various other methods to achieve the result we wanted.
This mindset can leak into our spiritual life, and impatience in spiritual matters can pose a threat to our faith and trust in the Lord. The longer we wait, the greater the opportunity for our courage and conviction to waver. The human heart, after all, is a frail thing.
There are some among us who are waiting on the Lord to work in our life. It could be guidance with which college to attend, what degree to pursue, what career to enter, or what man or woman to marry. It could be help with broken relationships, health problems, financial issues. During the wait, we may struggle with a wide range of high and low feelings, such as confidence in the Lord and discouragement when He seems to be quiet. We know from the Scriptures that the Lord hears us when we pray to Him. In Isaiah 65:24, the Lord promises: "...before they [His people] call, I will answer; and while they are yet speaking, I will hear." We know this, of course we know, but there are times when our weak humanity overwhelms us and we feel lost, alone.
Waiting is hard, even for the Christian.
So what do we do? Do we give up? Give in? God forbid!
Waiting is never easy, but there is always a reason. Even though we cannot see it while we are in the present, the Lord knows exactly what we need and when. If we look back over those times in our lives where we thought the Lord was not answering our prayers, when the waiting seemed to be unbearable, we are able to see the Lord's hand guiding us through. That alone should give us courage to push onward and endure any future waits.
However, if you struggling right now, perhaps you will find comfort in knowing that you are not alone. Whatever it is you are going through, others have experienced it and, through the strength of the Lord, overcame the agonizing wait (Philippians 4:13). Some testimonies have been recorded in the Scriptures. In 1 Corinthians 10:11, we are told: "Now all these things happened unto them for examples: and they are written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the world are come."
For those waiting for a life-changing event, remember that exiled Israel had to wait 70 years for the fulfillment of the Lord's promise through the project Jeremiah to bring them out of exile. (Jeremiah 29:10-13)
For those waiting for the right marriage partner, Isaac was forty-years-old when he married Rebekah according to Genesis 25:20.
For those waiting for a child or struggling with infertility, Sarah, Hannah, the mother, of Samson, and Elisabeth all endured the agony of infertility before the Lord blessed them with a child. And according to 2 Samuel 6:23, Michal, the first wife of David, never had children.
Whatever it is that you are waiting on the Lord for – no matter how long it seems that silence is your only answer, no matter how dark your current situation may seem – hold fast to the promise of Romans 8:28.
Real quickly I want to diverge onto a tangent, and this is very important. There are three things that we, humans, tend to do that make waiting worse: worry, coveting, and running ahead of God.
Let's look at the first: worry. Worry has a way of getting inside our minds and taking root very deeply. Some individuals, for whatever reason, are more pre-disposed to anxiety than others, and anxiety often has more than just psychological effects. Some people experience physical pain associated with high anxiety. Worry, anxiety, is not healthy physically, emotionally, or spiritually. It causes us to chronically view life from a negative perspective, overlooking all the blessings by focusing in on only the bad things. If left unchecked, this anxiety can damage our relationship with the Lord as well as our relationships with others. The apostle Paul wrote to the believers in Philippi with these encouraging words: “Be anxious for nothing, but in everything by prayer and supplication, with thanksgiving, let your requests be made known to God” (Philippians 4:6).
The second, covetousness, is similar. Covetousness often begins with a harmless, passing thought, perhaps along the lines of: "I wish I had a good job like that." or "Why not me?" It settles into our hearts and minds and pumps out poison into our lives. Without realizing it, we grow dissatisfied with what the Lord has done for us and greedily long for the blessings the Lord has bestowed on others. James 1:14-15 gives us insight into how this transformation occurs in the heart and mind. “But each one is tempted when he is drawn away by his own desires and enticed. Then, when desire has conceived, it gives birth to sin; and sin, when it is full-grown, brings forth death.” Like worry, this discontent will weaken our faith and trust in the Lord.
The third way we tend to worsen our situation is by running ahead of the Lord. After waiting a certain amount of time, our impatience leads us to doubt the Lord or come to the faulty conclude that the Lord must be waiting for us to act first. It is just like that saying, which is often erroneously attributed to the Bible but actually originating from ancient Greece, “God helps those who help themselves.” We use human logic and reasoning to talk ourselves into doing something that is not guided by the Holy Spirit. The end result often only complicates the situation. For example, after waiting for years and years with no apparent answer from the Lord, Abraham and Sarah tried to bring about the Lord’s promise of a child themselves: Abraham took Sarah’s handmaiden Hagar as a second wife. The history of God’s people was complicated by the misunderstandings and hatred that sprung up between the descendants of the son of promise, Isaac, and the son of man’s way, Ishmael. Proverbs 3:5 tells us clearly “Trust in the LORD with all your heart, and lean not on your own understanding” and Proverbs 14:12 warns: “There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.”
So how do we strengthen our faith and deepen our trust in the Lord while we are waiting?
I believe the key to this is coming to understand that even though we may be waiting for the Lord in whatever situation of our life (family, career, health, whatever it may be), we cannot be idle. The apostles, in the upper room, were waiting on the Lord but while they waited, they were not idle. They put away their differences, selfish desires, earnestly drawing together and pouring our their hearts to the Lord in prayer. And the result? The Holy Spirit fell upon those waiting and many were reached for the cause of Christ.
Even though we may be waiting on the Lord, we need to have faith that He has a plan for our lives. We need to keep our faith in the Lord on fire NOW through studying God’s Word, praying, fellowshipping with believers, witnessing to those within our sphere of influence, and living every single day for the glory of the Lord.
Remember, it is the little moments that happen every day that often make the biggest difference. We often wait for the Lord to give us a grand mission—a call to ministry, an opening as a missionary to a far-off place, whatever the dream may be—and while He may do that, He also expects us to live every day in faith. That includes sharing the Gospel in any capacity that we are able to in the "short term". We have an individual personal responsibility to witness for Christ NOW, not tomorrow or in ten years.
Think of it this way: the Lord has placed you in this exact time and place for a reason, even if you cannot see it. In Acts of the Apostles on page 109, Ellen White spoke of "a large class [of people] who need to be taught by such missionaries as Philip—men who will hear the voice of God and go where He sends them. There are many who are reading the Scriptures who cannot understand their true import. All over the world men and women are looking wistfully to heaven. Prayers and tears and inquiries go up from souls longing for light, for grace, for the Holy Spirit. Many are on the verge of the kingdom, waiting only to be gathered in."
The first priority in our life should always be sharing the message of Christ with those in our sphere of influence: our family, friends, co-workers, neighbors, and community. Let nothing else, not even what we may be waiting for, get in the way of this prime directive. In the end, having a career, marriage, children, etc. will mean absolutely nothing if we did not use what the Lord blessed us with to win souls to Christ. And what a glorious message we have to share! No other branch of Christendom has been given the privilege, and responsibility, of sharing the first, second, and third angels' messages.
In Evangelism, page 119, we read: "In a special sense Seventh-day Adventists have been set in the world as watchmen and light-bearers. To them has been entrusted the last warning for a perishing world. On them is shining wonderful light from the Word of God. They have been given a work of the most solemn import,—the proclamation of the first, second, and third angels’ messages. There is no other work of so great importance. They are to allow nothing else to absorb their attention."
And in Christian Service on page 145, we are told: "Let every Seventh-day Adventist ask himself, “What can I do to proclaim the third angel’s message?” Christ came to this world to give this message to His servant to give to the churches. It is to be proclaimed to every nation, kindred, tongue, and people. How are we to give it?"
Even though we may be waiting on the Lord to move in our own lives—whether it is help with finances or health issues, concerns for wayward children, which person we should marry, or what job to take, we cannot forsake our duty to share the good news of Jesus with those around us today, right now.
A different kind of dinosaur
Back in 2006, my company completed a spray-foam insulation project for Indianapolis Allison, a large GM plant in the heart of the city. The weather was good, and the project was eventually completed. I have to be honest. I have not seen so many lazy people in one city block as I did at that plant. And I blame the labor union mindset for that diminished work ethic. As we move into the year 2013, I sense that the time is right to ask ourselves, “Do Adventist Christians have any business joining labor unions?”
The first head of the American Federation of Labor Samuel Gompers, summed it up nicely in 1886 when asked what organized labor really wanted, he replied, “More.” There is more, and we are going to unmask it in this article.
Trade unions rose to prominence at a time when industrialized countries were growing at a staggering rate. In those days employee safety was often secondary to profits and job security was mostly non-existent. That was the 1840’s. Organized unions were a necessary provisional corrective to the exploitations of early industrial-revolution business. Then, as the industrialized nations matured, working conditions along with ingenuity, production safety, and efficiency all improved. By the 1920’s the industrial climate typified by Henry Ford and Herbert Hoover reached an apogee, buttressed by endemic optimism, efficient government and a profound confidence in the future. May I remind you that today’s situation has made labor unions a wholly unnecessary dinosaur standing in the shadow of a great federal regulatory beast? Unless workers are held at gunpoint, it is not possible to "exploit" them for any length of time today.
Here’s irony. Today’s progressives find fault with the church for clinging to “outdated” morals and beliefs (as if Biblical belief could ever be outdated). In liberal circles it is vogue to mock the church as clinging to a faded image etched onto a Victorian daguerreotype.
This is why it is interesting to watch so-called "Progressives" tout 19th century solutions for 21st century problems. Liberals in the church who support labor unions (and there are a growing number of them) are themselves museum curators cultivating the relics of antiquity. Labor unions are modern dinosaurs that should by now be extinct. They were needed at the turn of the 20th century to protect workers from dangerous working conditions, but they survive today as a political tool to influence elections and exert economic power. However, another (and far more sinister) goal is "increased forced unionization.” They want everybody to be like them!
It is not surprising unionized companies like GM, Chrysler, and Bethlehem Steel went bankrupt, and that heavily unionized states like California, New York, and Illinois are in deep financial trouble. By their very nature, unions must seek to drive their employers into bankruptcy. If they don't, then they aren't doing their job. Too harsh you say? Not at all.
The purpose of a union is to extract from its employer more than the market wage. If it doesn't do this, then there is no reason for workers to support it or to pay dues to it. And because companies must sell their output at market prices and pay market returns for the capital that they employ, they cannot afford to pay more than "market" for any major input. Accordingly, any unionized company for which labor is a significant part of its cost structure will eventually be destroyed. Thus, I can sum up the labor union mindset as trying to take more out of the system than they can put back into it.
As mentioned earlier, unless workers are held at gunpoint, it is not possible to "exploit" them for any length of time. That is why labor unions have become a modern dinosaur. In my opinion, they ought to go away. They once served a purpose but that time has long since passed. They have turned into very powerful, self-serving organizations that are hurting America and our ability to compete with the rest of the world. Yet I don’t think they are going away. Here’s why, "The trades unions will be one of the agencies that will bring upon this earth a time of trouble such as has not been since the world began" (LDE 116).
Whoa. With these startling words, the Spirit of Prophecy pulls back the curtain of the future. This is what’s coming. I told you there was more.
Could it really be that these “harmless” trade unions, many of which began in the 1840’s could become a ferocious monster in the time of the end? Absolutely. A fitting emblem of the “lamb that speaks like a dragon” is these organizations that began with decent intentions, and end with the fiery outbreath of persecution.
“But can’t we join one anyway and ignore these old outdated warnings?” You can, yes. At great peril.
“I need to provide for my family, and God wants us to be happy right?” No. The Lord wants us to be faithful. As we are faithful to His ways, joy comes into our lives. “If you know these things, happy are you if you do them” (John 13:17).
Those who claim to be the children of God are in no case to bind up with the labor unions that are formed or that shall be formed. This the Lord forbids. Cannot those who study the prophecies see and understand what is before us? The transgressors of the law of God have taken sides with their Leader, the General of rebellion. He understands how to devise his Satanic schemes and through whom to work for the carrying out of them. He is striving to lead every soul to take sides with him, and under the influence of his temptations, thousands are binding themselves up in bundles, ready to be consumed by the fires of the last day. 4MR 78
Samuel Gomper said it. Interviewed in 1886, his answer to the question “What do you labor unions want?” was “More!” Ok. Now let’s look back at the results of another interview in the Heavenly Country above. In the God-to-Isaiah transmission of truth all the unholy desires of Lucifer–-as he mutated into Satan–-are easily summed up in this one word “More!” (Isaiah 14:12-17). He wanted to take more out of the system then he was able to put back. This wrong spirit introduces friction into the universe and ultimately leads to violence (John 8:44). That explains why labor unions tend towards violence so easily.
The work of the people of God is to prepare for the events of the future, which will soon come upon them with blinding force. In the world gigantic monopolies will be formed. Men will bind themselves together in unions that will wrap them in the folds of the enemy. A few men will combine to grasp all the means to be obtained in certain lines of business. Trades unions will be formed, and those who refuse to join these unions will be marked men. 2SM 142
So what do you think? Is it ok for Adventist believers to join labor/trade unions?
“Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship has righteousness with unrighteousness? and what ‘union’ has light with darkness?” (2 Corinthians 6:14).
We’ve been warned.
Science affirms Daniel's diet lowers cancer risk
I knock gently on my patient’s door and hesitantly walk in. After the initial exchange of greetings I carefully state, “Ms. Doe, I have some bad news. The pathology report indicates cancer….” News such as this is every physician’s and patient’s nightmare. To this day, disclosing the “C” (cancer) word both as a physician and as a human being fills me with fear. But is this fear completely founded?
Many of us view the “C” word as a result of hereditary genes, as though we were handed a set of genes by our parents and there is nothing we can do about it. But is that really the case? While it is true that heredity plays a large role in disease, the good news is that new advances in scientific research indicate that we don’t have to be quite so scared hereditary genes as we used to think. Furthermore, this same research indicates that we can not only prevent the big “C” but, in many cases, even treat it with simple dietary changes and moderate exercise. Excitingly, science was not the first to discover these revolutionary principles. God as our Great Physician and Creator advised us of these same principles long ago, both in the Bible and in the Spirit of Prophecy. In our television show Practical Living and in our health lectures, we focus on all eight of God’s perfect health plan. However in the following article, we will primarily focus on nutrition.
The scientific community has for some time noted the benefits of a vegetarian diet in cancer prevention. In fact, in 2012 the largest meta-analysis of multiple different studies indicated over an 18 percent decrease in cancer among vegetarians as opposed to non-vegetarians.(3) With all the positive benefits on cancer prevention noted from a vegetarian diet, many have wondered what role in cancer prevention and treatment a completely plant based or vegan diet plays. This was the basis of the recent National Cancer Institute funded study performed and published by Loma Linda University. In the Adventist Health Study 2 (AHS-2), the researchers studied over 60,000 people. Controlling for confounders such as smoking, alcohol use and a family medical history of cancer, the researchers discovered that while vegetarian diets do confer a protective role against cancer, veganism confers the greatest decrease in cancer at a 34 percent decrease in cancer from a vegetarian diet alone. This improved cancer protection was noted in both genders but very specifically in prostate cancer and female related cancer including breast, ovarian and cervical cancers.(7)
In response to the AHS-2, many are asking, “Why such a significant decrease in cancer among vegans versus vegetarians?” The answer to this question is the basis of the research performed by Pritikin researchers, a group of concerned scientists and physicians dedicated to discovering the relationship of disease and diet. Their first attempt to answer this question involved taking petri dishes with prostate cancer cells, the “number one” cancer in men, and exposing them to the blood of vegans versus those on a standard American diet. The petri dishes were followed over the course of a year, noting cancer cell growth and programmed cell death or apoptosis. Much to the excitement of the researchers, the prostate cancer cells were significantly affected by both, by a decrease in growth and increased programmed cell death. In fact, the leading researcher Dr. Ornish and his group discovered that a vegan diet decreased cancer growth by nearly 8 times over the standard American Diet.(5) Although these results were phenomenonal, the Pritikin researchers wanted to determine if this same effect could be substantiated over an even shorter time interval and with the most common cancer in women, breast cancer. As such, they took three different breast cancer cell lines including estrogen and progesterone receptor resistant ductal carcinoma, one of the more difficult to treat breast cancers, and exposed them to the blood of non-vegan women. Then, these same participants were then asked and agreed to undergo a two week vegan diet. After only 12 days, the petri dishes were assessed and amazingly there were significant decreases in cancer cell growth and exponential increases in apoptosis (programmed cell death). Imagine that! In just 12 days, one’s blood can be completely altered on a healthy, plant based diet so much so that the body is able to fight off cancer. The exciting news is that this same 10-day interval effect can be seen in numerous other diseases as well.
Pritikin researchers sought to determine what element in the vegan women’s blood was combating the cancer cells. In 2011, the researchers published their results that demonstrated clearly that the hormone involved is Insulin like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1). For some time, IGF-1 has been known to promote cancer cell growth and decrease programmed cell death, both clearly substantiated in the article published by Soliman et.al.(2) Combining their research with that of Ngo’s article (4), the Pritikin researchers were able to show that a vegan diet lowered IGF-1 levels even as low as half their Average American omnivore diet level.(4,6) In addition, the researchers discovered that eating a vegan diet not only lowers your current risk of cancer but it also combats years of meat-eating by lowering IGF-1 binding globulin which lowers “old” accumulated IGF-1. This is accomplished by assisting the liver in “binding” up cancer causing IGF-1 and eliminating it through the gastrointestinal tract. Through these two mechanisms, the researchers determined that your body is able to drastically fight cancer in as little as 12 days.
The really good news about combating cancer with a plant based diet is that there are no side effects. In addition, according to numerous studies, the results of a plant-based or vegan diet are far reaching and don’t just decrease your risk of cancer, but help you prevent, treat and defeat diabetes, hypertension, obesity and other health problems. In future articles, we will be examining each of these diseases individually and noting the benefits of a plant based healthy diet among other lifestyle changes. In contrast, research is very clear that meat eating decreases longevity by worsening many of these diseases. Although an improvement to a meat diet, a lacto-oval diet is also not ideal and does not carry the best health results as noted with a vegan or completely plant based diet. According to a recent report by the CDC Nurses’ Health Study, eating the equivalent of one egg per day shortened a females life as much as smoking five cigarettes per day for 15 years.(1) This statistic concerning a lacto-oval diet suggests there is a good, better, and best diet. And, if you are looking for the lowest risk of cancer, heart disease, diabetes, obesity, hypertension and many, many other diseases, the best is the original healthy plant based diet given in Eden (Genesis 1:29).
The vast and quickly realized benefits of a plant-based vegan diet remind me of the dietary blessings of this same diet as noted in Daniel Chapter 1. Here, Daniel was given 10 days of a plant based diet. At the end of his “10 day Daniel diet trial,” he was rewarded with appearing healthier than all his other omnivore colleagues (Daniel 1:11,15). These results were found exponential, when, at the end of three years of eating a plant based diet, he and his friends were found to be 10 times smarter, and l would postulate based on the above research, 10 times healthier and with perhaps 10 times less risk of cancer, than all of his counterparts (Daniel 1:19,20).
The above exciting research shows that in as little as 12 days--and I would dare to state 10 days--a plant based diet is 8 to 10 times more effective in decreasing our risk of cancer when compared with the average American diet. This knowledge has motivated me to ask my patients to give me 10 days of a plant based vegan diet. Stressing the positive results of improved cholesterol, weight loss and glucose control, and now, more exciting than ever, a decrease in cancer, I will fuel my patients incentive to "try the Daniel diet." Perhaps if you haven’t yet tried the Daniel 10 Day Diet, you too will test it out and I guarantee you won’t be dissatisfied.
REFERENCES:
1). Baer, HJ., et.al. American Journal of Epidemiology. 11 Feb 1;173(3):319-29. Epub 2010 Dec 6. Risk Factors for Mortality in the Nurses' Health Study: a Competing Risks Analysis.
2). Barnard, RJ., et.al. Journal of Nutrition and Cancer. 2006;55(1):28-34. Effects of a Low-Fat, High-Fiber Diet and Exercise Program on Breast Cancer Risk Factors in vivo and Tumor Cell Growth and Apoptosis in vitro.
3). Huang T., et.al. Annuals of Nutrition and Metabolism. 2012; 60;233-240. Cardiovascular Disease Mortality and Cancer Incidence in Vegetarians; A Metanalysis and Systemic Review. 4). Ngo, Th., et.al., Journal of Cancer Causes and Control. 2002 Dec;13(10):929-35. Effect of Diet and Exercise on Serum Insulin, IGF-I, and IGFBP-1 Levels and Growth of LNCaP Cells in vitro (United States.
5). Ornish, D, et.al., Journal of Urology. 2005 Sep;174(3):1065-9; discussion 1069-70. Intensive Lifestyle Changes May Affect the Progression of Prostate Cancer.
6). Soliman, S., et.al. Journal of Evidence Based Complement and Alternative Medicine. 2011; Epub 2011 Mar 15. Analyzing Serum-Stimulated Prostate Cancer Cell Lines After Low-Fat, High-Fiber Diet and Exercise Intervention.
7). Tantamango-Bartley, Y., et.al. Journal of Cancer Epidemiological Biomarkers and Preventation. 2012, Nov 20, Vegetarian Diets and the Incidence of Cancer in a Low-Risk Population.
La Sierra releases statement on Diaz and bylaw changes
La Sierra University was contacted the day ADvindicate published "La Sierra University hires new evolutionary biologist," but was unavailable for comment until today. Their full statement is posted below:
For Immediate Release Larry Becker Executive Director, University Relations lbecker@lasierra.edu 1-‐1-‐1
La Sierra University Responds to False Charges on Independent Websites
Educatetruth.com and ADvindicate.com have focused their efforts on damaging the reputation of Dr. Raul Diaz, who joined the La Sierra University biology faculty at the beginning of January.
Initially one of these sites used an unnamed source to accuse Dr. Diaz of being an atheist. When that was proven false, the site changed its conjecture to Dr. Diaz being agnostic. In fact, Dr. Diaz is a baptized member of the Seventh‐day Adventist Church. He has attended various Adventist churches throughout the span of his academic career.
Dr. Diaz is also quoted by these sites as saying he is an “evolutionary biologist.” Using this as an attack shows a lack of understanding of contemporary biology. An “evolutionary biologist” does focused analysis of the diversity of life, the genetic variations of living organisms, and how organisms interact with their environment. Through this important work, these scientists make possible advances in human health and medicine, agriculture, and the environment.
Dr. Diaz is a dedicated and talented young scientist who is seeking to discover what causes human facial and hand malformations through his research. His passion for his subject has already shone through to students in the three weeks he has been on campus. He looks forward to using his bio-‐medical research to develop classes for students with a pre‐professional health focus. His field and laboratory research efforts will also benefit those students planning to seek graduate biology education.
EducateTruth.com has also been attempting to short‐circuit the board’s efforts to revise the university’s bylaws in response to WASC’s and AAA’s concerns regarding governance issues. The Bylaws Committee members have worked many hours educating themselves so that they fully understand the issues. Their efforts have resulted in a set of recommended bylaws changes for the university constituents to act on during a special constituency meeting on February 21.
These recommendations are not designed to remove the university from Church control, as claimed by some. The proposals leave that defining relationship strong and unchanged, while addressing WASC’s stated concern about potential conflict of interest at the board leadership level. This is a unique situation, because the Pacific Union Conference is the only union in the North America Division where the union president chairs two college boards—Pacific Union College and La Sierra University.
A key recommendation from the Bylaws Committee is that the board chair be elected and be one of the four Pacific Union officers who serve as ex officio board members, rather than automatically being the union president. This allows the board to select its own chair, while ensuring that the chair will always be a union officer. The only limitation imposed through the proposal is that neither the board chair or vice chair of La Sierra University’s board may concurrently serve as chair or vice chair of another university or college board.
There is no change to the ex officio membership of the board, which will continue to have among its members the Pacific Union Conference president, secretary, treasurer, vice president, director of education, and the presidents of the Arizona, Southeastern California, and Southern California Conferences. The revised bylaws make no change to the constituent membership, and the constituency retains all existing control over lay appointments to the board and any amendments to the bylaws.
The board, according to the proposed bylaws, will continue to focus on setting policies that keep the university closely aligned with the mission, goals, and objectives of the Adventist Church.
#-‐#-‐#
La Sierra University hires new evolutionary biologist
Report on first meeting of the Theology of Ordination Study Committee
The most important Adventist Bible study conference in more than 30 years got underway last week. The Theology of Ordination Study Committee (TOSC) held its initial meeting January 15th through the 17th, as committee members from all over the world converged on a hotel in Maryland. It was widely felt that this study would be the most noteworthy such convocation since Glacier View in 1980, and might be remembered as being of similar significance to the 1888 General Conference Session. TOSC was conceived of after a delegate to the 2010 General Conference Session suggested that the church conduct a comprehensive study of ordination. GC President Elder Ted Wilson took the idea for a comprehensive study group to the GC Administrative Committee in September, 2011, and the idea was approved. TOSC will meet three more times, four times in all, with the objective of reaching consensus on a theology of ordination and as to whether women may properly be ordained to the gospel ministry. The study will be concluded in the summer of 2014, and a report provided to the GC Executive Committee for review at Annual Council in the autumn of 2014. The Annual Council will then decide on any items to be referred for action to the 2015 General Conference Session.
What did not happen with TOSC is more newsworthy than anything that has happened thus far: There was no attempt to bias the outcome of the committee's study by packing its membership. It appears that the membership is roughly equally divided between those in favor of and those opposed to female ordination. Moreover, the most articulate advocates on each side have been included. Prominent Adventist preachers in favor of (Dwight Nelson, Randy Roberts) and opposed to (Doug Batchelor, Stephen Bohr) female ordination are on the committee. Prominent Adventist scholars and theologians in favor of (Richard Davidson, Angel Rodriguez, Jan Barna, Darius Jankiewicz) and opposed to (P. Gerard Damsteegt, C. Raymond Holmes) female ordination are on the committee. There are female pastors who have already been ordained (Chris Oberg, Kendra Haloviak Valentine) as well as accomplished lay women (Kathryn Proffitt, former telecom executive and U.S. ambassador to Malta; Doris Gothard, former General Motors executive and lay church leader; Carol Zarska, founder of an independent ministry on the sanctuary). A complete list of committee members can be found here.
Not only does the larger committee strongly reflect both points of view, the smaller executive or steering committee also seems to be about equally divided: Davidson and Rodriguez are in favor of female ordination and Damsteegt and Fagal are opposed. Those tapped to present papers at the initial meeting also appeared to be about equally split. The committee is expected to pray and study its way to a consensus without a human thumb on the scales predetermining the outcome.
All this is in marked contrast to the procedure followed by the two rebellious unions last summer. They enlisted their tithe-supported union news magazines to argue in favor of female ordination, without presenting any contrary viewpoints. Then, at the special constituency meetings, only the arguments in favor of female ordination were presented. (Elder Wilson was allowed to speak at both meetings, but his comments were limited to church unity and order; he did not speak to the merits of female ordination.) I am told that the rabbit was put in the hat with regard to delegate selection, as well. After such a carefully choreographed process, the outcome of the votes was never in doubt.
In view of the two unions' one-sided procedure, and their rudeness toward Elder Wilson (the infamous “point of order” interruption), I would have followed the same procedure, to the opposite purpose: pack the committee with those opposed to female ordination, present only the anti-female ordination side of the issue, force a vote, and then present the results to Annual Council and the 2015 General Conference Session. But Ted Wilson is a better man than I am. If he was ever tempted to implement such a cynical strategy, he did not act upon the temptation. To the contrary, he wants and expects a full and fair hearing of the issue, with the strongest advocates on both sides involved in the process. He recognizes that the church must work through this issue with Bible study and fervent prayer. That he is able to put aside personal views, and even personal slights, and act only in the best interest of the Seventh-day Adventist Church impresses me that he is God's chosen leader for this time. I have immense respect for him.
Back to TOSC's initial meeting last week. Each day began with a devotional and a season of prayer. There were about six opportunities for prayer each day; typically, we prayed in groups of two or three, followed by a closing prayer from a microphone. The first day's devotional was presented by Mark Finley, who told a deeply moving story about forgiveness in the wake of the Rwandan massacres of 1994. Elder Wilson gave us our commission, and committee chair Artur Stele outlined the procedure we would be following. The steering committee decided to devote the first meeting to preliminary issues, such as hermeneutics, and the study of ordination itself, without regard to whether women can be ordained or to what offices.
The first paper was titled, “Dealing with Doctrinal Issues in the Church: Proposals for Ground Rules,” by Paul Ratsara and Richard Davidson. There was an opportunity for comments from the floor after each paper was presented. After lunch, William Fagal, who has perhaps the most beautiful speaking voice I've ever heard, presented a paper on, “The Proper Role of Ellen G. White's Writings in Resolving Church Controversies.” Next, Mario Veloso presented a paper titled, “Hermeneutic—A case of Biblical Understanding.” This paper was not in finished form, and seemed redundant in light of the 1986 Rio Document, the Seventh-day Adventist Church's approved statement of its scriptural hermeneutic.
Dr. George Reid, who was at the Biblical Research Institute in 1986 and was involved in drafting the Rio Document, answered questions about it. The final paper of the first day was, “Ellen G. White on Bible Hermeneutics,” presented by Dr. Damsteegt.
Day two began with a devotional by Kendra Haloviak Valentine, who teaches New Testament at La Sierra University. With the preliminaries regarding basic hermeneutics and Bible-study methods out of the way, the committee turned to the question of ordination itself. David Trim, the outstanding historian of Seventh-day Adventism, presented a paper on “Ordination in Seventh-day Adventist History.” He pointed out that this conference is the first time that we, as a church, have ever considered the theology of ordination. Darius Jankiewicz presented a paper titled, “The Problem of Ordination: Lessons from Early Christian History,” which showed that, within a couple of centuries of the apostles, ordination had become synonymous with authority to administer the sacraments, and in later Catholic practice came to convey irrevocable spiritual infallibility. Dr. Damsteegt then presented a paper on “The Magisterial Reformers [Luther and Calvin] on Ordination.”
After lunch, Angel Rodriguez presented a paper titled, “Towards a Theology of Ordination,” around which, it was hoped, the committee could form a consensus. Many wanted to comment on this paper, and it was eventually decided, after much fervent prayer and several suggestions regarding a way forward, to divide into five discussion groups of roughly 20 people each. This was done, and the sub-committees met and discussed suggestions as to how the consensus document could be improved. This took up the remainder of the day.
The third and final day of the conference began with a devotional by Joel Musvosvi, followed by more prayer, after which each group presented its suggestions as to how the consensus paper could be improved. Dr. Rodriguez had taken a minimalistic approach to the selection of Scripture passages for inclusion, limiting himself to those passages discussing the laying on of hands; hence, a common suggestion of the discussion groups was to broaden the paper to include Bible passages relating to setting apart to, and qualifications for, religious offices, regardless whether such passages mention the laying on of hands. There were quite a few other suggestions. The paper was to be revised after a prayerful review of the suggestions, and it is hoped that the committee will be able to reach consensus on a revised paper on the first day of the next meeting, which will be held this summer. Once consensus is achieved on this paper, the committee will turn to the more contentious issue of female ordination. After concluding remarks and announcements by Artur Stele and the steering committee staff, and a concluding devotional by Geoffrey Mbwana, the meeting was adjourned.
One of the most rewarding aspects of a conference of this type is the opportunity it provides to visit with other members of the committee. I was blessed to be able to visit with Dwight Nelson on the drive from the airport to the hotel, to share a meal with Doug Batchelor, and to chat with Elder Wilson about the work of the church in far flung locales such as Japan. I had a wonderful visit with Darius Jankiewicz, one of our scholars who is currently teaching at the seminary; we are the same age and crossed paths in Warsaw, Poland, in 1980, when my father's choir from Southwestern Adventist University visited that city and sang in several Adventist Churches. It was a pleasure to visit more extensively with Kevin Paulson, with whom I have often sparred online (although we agree far more than we disagree). I was also blessed to be able to visit with some dynamic Adventist lay women, including Carol Zarska, Doris Gothard, and Kathryn Proffitt. These opportunities for personal interaction are undoubtedly the nicest thing about such convocations. I am grateful beyond words for this opportunity to be enriched by association with so many thoughtful and accomplished brothers and sisters in Christ.
Note: Committee chair Artur Stele has noted that all papers presented are considered drafts subject to revision until the committee completes its work and submits its final report, after which time they will become public. He has therefore asked committee members not to disseminate the papers themselves. Since I am not at liberty to release the papers, please don't ask.
What is an apostle?
During the current discussions regarding leadership roles within the church, one area often referenced is that of an apostle.[1] What is an apostle? what are the qualifications? Is an apostle ordained to an office, or is it an inner calling manifested in a Spiritual Gift or both? What relevance is the apostle in the church today, and is the office or gift of apostle gender specific, or inclusive? The object of this article is to come to some initial conclusions regarding this type of ministry.
Statistical Findings
The Greek word for apostle is apostolos.[2] Apostolos is used 81 times in the N.T. It is used only once each in Matthew and Mark, six in Luke and 30 in Acts. Except for four references in Jude and Revelation, the remaining 38 references are found in Paul’s writings.
Etymology
Originally, the Greek word for apostle, apostolos, was used as an adjective.[3] Initially it denoted the dispatch of a “fleet (or army) on a military expedition.”[4] Later, it came to be applied to “the fleet itself and acquired the meaning of a naval expedition.”[5] Finally, it referred to a “group of men sent out for a particular purpose, e.g., an army . . . [or a] band of colonists.”[6] In Cynic-Stoic philosophy, it is a “technical term for commissioning and authorizing by a deity.”[7] And in Greek culture, an apostle was known as “the champion of one religion"--missionaries for “religious propaganda.”[8] When looking at Jewish literature, the term apostolos was “not widely used. . . [and] the term appears only twice in Josephus.”[9]
Word Group
The broader word group of which apostolos is associated, includes the verb apostello. “The frequency of apostello reflects the importance of being commissioned.”[10] “The noun apostole derives its meaning from apostello, and it describes the office of an apostle (apostolate), or the act of sending rather than the thing sent. In secular usage it was a noun of action used for the sending of ships, the shooting of a missile, and the sending of a mummy. It also described the sending of an expedition.”[11]
Lexical Meanings
The meanings for apostolos in First Century Greek were:
1) One sent forth (apo, from stello- to send)[12], ambassador[13], delegate[14], agent[15], envoy[16], any messenger[17]-in a general sense- anyone sent[18] (on a mission[19], service[20], business[21], assignment[22] or errand[23]), bearer of a commission[24], represent another person some way.[25]
2 ) Fleet, an expedition,[26] sea-faring and military expeditions[27].
Interestingly, in the N.T. apostolos never means the act of sending. It “always denotes a man who is sent, and sent with full authority.”[28] New Testament theologian Gerhard Kittel has commented that apostolos is a “commissioned representative of a congregation. . . [and] a bearer of the NT message.”[29]
Pre-Eminent Apostle: Jesus Christ
The first mention of an apostle in the New Testament is in the life of Jesus Himself. In His final prayer, Jesus declared that the Father had “sent”[30] Him. Throughout His life He had “manifested” the Father’s name,[31] “glorified” Him on earth[32] and represented Him so perfectly that when seeing Him, you saw “the Father.”[33] Jesus was sent as an Ambassador and Delegate of the Father. He was truly the first apostle, not only in time but in primacy. In fact, Hebrews makes this clear when it describes Him as “the Apostle and High priest of our profession.”[34] New Testament scholar Don Dent has noted that “before He sent out His own apostles, Jesus was Himself God’s apostle to the world. . . Jesus did not ask His apostles to do anything that He Himself had not already done.“[35] Therefore, when we consider the N.T. evidence for apostolos, we start with the Pattern for all others--Jesus Christ.
PHASE ONE: The Twelve
Jesus choose twelve men from those who followed Him, and named them apostles (“whom he also named apostles“[36]). Ellen White comments on the reason why Jesus did this, “that He might send them forth as His witnesses, to declare to the world what they had seen and heard of Him.”[37] Later, Jesus “sent”[38] His apostles on a missionary tour, for the purpose of proclaiming “the kingdom of God,”[39] “healing the sick,”[40] and “preaching the gospel.”[41] The criteria for belonging to this elite group was:
1) They must be with Jesus to witness His ministry[42]- “beginning from the baptism of John,” His ascension and “resurrection.”[43]
2) They would be “sent out to preach.”[44]
3) They were to “have power to heal the sick and cast out devils.”[45]
The Twelve continued to intact after Pentecost[46], but their mission shifted from being Ambassadors of Christ on earth, to the risen Christ in Heaven. The success of their mission was a result of two primary factors: first, they had been empowered by the Holy Spirit at Pentecost, second, they had been direct witnesses of Jesus’ ministry and learners of His teachings. The combination of these two factors enabled them “with great power” to give “witness of the resurrection of the Lord.”[47] The Twelve had been trained and experienced in entering new places to prepare the way for the Jesus to enter, as a result they played a critical role in leading a movement that was spreading out from Jerusalem.[48]
PHASE TWO: Office of Apostle
After the resurrection and ascension of Jesus, the disciples were no longer in training. While Christ was with them personally, they were simply referred to as apostles. In Acts 1:25, the disciples prayed that God would show them who should take Judas’ position, that “he may take part of this ministry and apostleship (apostole). . .” (KJV). This is the first instance that the work and role of the apostles was referred to as an office or an organized function. The word “apostleship” (apostole) has three basic meanings:
1) Sending away, sending off (of troops[49]),[50] dispatching,[51] expedition of ships[52], mission,[53] expedition[54]
2) Discharge, dismissal,[55] release[56]
3) Office of Apostle,[57] apostleship,[58] office of Apostolate,[59] special role of elite Ambassadorship,[60] office of one sent,[61] office of a special emissary.[62]
The first two definitions of “apostole” don’t seem to fit the context of Acts 1:25, since it is referring to a collective group or company of people. In commenting on Judas’ fall, the disciples recognized that he had left their assembly (Acts 1:25- “. . . apostleship, from which Judas by transgression fell“), thus the reference to an office. This office of The Twelve was a singular, non-repeatable ministry in the history of the church. Ellen White comments that “their office was the most important to which human beings had ever been called, and was second only to that of Christ Himself.”[63] They had been commissioned by Jesus as direct witnesses of His life. Ellen White seems to confirm this understanding when she wrote that “the twelve were called to the apostolate.”[64]
Interestingly, when The Twelve are mentioned in the N.T., the context contains words or phrases which identifies them[65]. When apostolos is referring to The Twelve, the following indicators confirm their identity: 1) the number twelve, 2) the specific names of the twelve (“Peter,” “John,” etc.), 3) Jesus in person, while He walked on earth, 4) the definite article preceding the word apostles ("THE Apostles"- Gr.-tous, tois, ton apostolos), and 5) the context (Acts 1:2- “He had chosen”; Acts 4:33- “witness to the resurrection”; 2 Pet. 3:2- “apostles of the Lord”, etc.). When one or any of these contextual markers are present, Scripture is signaling that the passage is only referring to this special office of the twelve apostles.
PHASE THREE: Paul and companions[66]
The expansion of the ministry of “apostolos” is seen in the work of Paul and his companions, Barnabas and Silas. “Paul was an apostle . . . because Jesus commissioned and sent him to accomplish His purpose. His commission was divine, because Jesus chose and sent him.”[67] “Galatians 1:1 makes it clear that Paul’s apostleship was not based on any human mediator, but was divinely authorized.”[68] Paul uses apostolos fourteen times for himself alone.[69]
There came a point, after Paul had been working for about one year, that both he and Barnabas were ordained as special messengers to the Gentiles. “The Holy Spirit said, ‘Separate Me Barnabas and Saul for the work I have called them.’ When they had fasted and prayed, and laid their hands on them, they sent them away” (Acts 13:2,3). Ellen White comments on this incident, “before being sent forth as missionaries to the heathen world [they] were solemnly dedicated to God by fasting and prayer and the laying on of hands.”[70]
Interestingly, Paul and Barnabas were called “missionaries” in this passage. This seems to be the modern equivalent of the word “apostolos." Paul references this “rite” later when he declares “I am ordained (KJV- set, put- footnote- not making a case for the meaning of ord.) a preacher and an apostle.”[71] It was at this point that Paul considered himself an apostle. Again, Ellen White comments on this incident, “Paul regarded the occasion of his formal ordination as marking the beginning of a new and important epoch in his lifework. It was from the time of this solemn ceremony, when, just before he was to depart on his first missionary Journey . . . that he afterward dated the beginning of his apostleship in the Christian church.”[72]
From this time onward, Paul introduces himself as an apostle,[73] and more specifically “an apostle to the Gentiles.”[74] His apostleship[75] appears to be specialized and singular, just as the office of the twelve was. In an apparent paradox, he calls himself “the least of the apostles, not worthy to be called an apostle,”[76] and yet asserts that he was “not inferior to the most eminent apostles.”[77] He basically declared that although his role as an apostle was different than the twelve, in taking the Gospel Commission to the Gentiles,he was not inferior to them.[78] The office of apostle (apostole) also applies to Paul and his companions. He refers to this three times in his own ministry: “we have received . . . Apostleship,”[79] “the seal of my apostleship,”[80] “Peter to the apostleship.”[81]
Interestingly, Luke calls Paul and Barnabas apostles “only after they go on their first missionary journey.“[82] It was when Paul and Barnabas were fulfilling the Great Commission that they were considered apostolos. They were on an “equal footing with the prominent apostles, but with a different sphere of ministry.”[83] Paul personally recruited both Silas and Timothy to join his missionary team, and their ministry functioned under his leadership (Acts 15:40-16:3). The fulfillment of the Gospel Commission through the labors of Paul, Barnabas, and his companions[84] completed this “phase” of the role of apostolos.
First Thess. 2:6-7 refers to Paul, Silvanus (Silas) and Timothy as apostolos. The most straightforward reading is that these three men were foundational as a “planting team” bringing the gospel to this city. “Paul considered Silas and Timothy to be apostles in close association with his own apostleship. Paul considered those who worked with him preaching the gospel and establishing new churches to be apostles of Christ.”[85]
PHASE FOUR: The Gift of Apostle
A shift in the biblical meaning of apostles took place after the initial establishment of churches. Up until this time the term apostolos was limited to those God had directly commissioned or ordained to fulfill the initial phase of the Gospel Commission. After the twelve, Paul and others had established churches, the apostolos became a spiritual gift through the agency of the Holy Spirit. It was no longer limited to the early church founders, but rather, those whom God gifted to be missionaries from the established churches. Ellen White explains:
Later in the history of the early Church, when in various parts of the world many groups of believers had been formed into churches, the organization of the church was further perfected. . . Some were endowed by the Holy Spirit with Special Gifts ‘and God has set some in the church, first apostles, secondarily prophets, thirdly teachers . . .’ [1 Cor. 12:28 quoted]. (my emphasis)[86]
Therefore, when the N.T. refers to the “Gift of Apostolos”- it seems to refer to the time after the initial establishment of churches had taken place (by the twelve, Paul, Barnabas, etc.), and the need for missionaries to be sent out from them was needed. Apostles have been needed in all ages and in all times since the apostolate closed in the first century. “Apostles are the first in a sequence of persons who build the church. . . [and] there is every indication that the gift was intended to be on-going.”[87] “Apostles lay the foundation of the church. Their ministry focuses on the initial stage of church planting. This work can be strenuous and ‘dirty’ and often forgotten by those who come in later stages, but the apostle is critical in establishing the strong base and general pattern for the church within a specific geographic or ethno-linguistic boundary.”[88] “Paul makes a careful distinction between their function as apostles and the calling as apostles of Christ to plant churches among the nations, by adding the modifier- ‘apostles OF CHRIST,’ ‘apostles OF THE CHURCHES’ or ‘apostles BEFORE ME.’”[89]
The debate regarding the ongoing role of apostles centers around whether Paul was teaching that missionary apostles are an on-going gift (1 Cor. 12:28 and Eph. 4:11), or whether he meant the unique ministries of eyewitnesses and specifically commissioned apostles. “The context of each passage seems to imply an on-going gift. The gift list in 1 Cor. 12 is in a chapter that emphasizes the diversity of gifts; the Body of Christ is not complete without all of them. If Paul assumed that apostles were not an on-going gift to the church, it seems incongruent with the basic argument of the chapter.”[90] The gifts mentioned in Ephesians 4:11 are given for the purpose of “equipping the saints to build up the church until we all attain to the fullness of Christ.”[91]
New Testament scholar Harold Hoehner has stated, “apostle [in Eph. 4:11, 1 Cor. 12:28] refers to . . . the gift of apostle. There were people in addition to the original twelve who had not been with Jesus in His ministry and did not witness His resurrection but who are listed as apostles. . . It seems the main function of an apostle is to establish churches in areas that have not been reached by others.”[92] Ephesians 4:11 teaches that the gift of Apostle is given until the Second Coming.[93]
Apostles are the first gift, though we should understand this as a priority of sequence rather than of status. In practical terms, the other gifts are on hold until apostle has planted the new church. As a “Gift of the Spirit”--“the church does not ‘raise up’ its apostles, but responds to the apostolic witness.”[94] Scholar David Garland notes: “Apostles appear first as the founders of the church communities.”[95]
Conclusion
This brief survey of apostolos highlights the fact that “New Testament writers, and especially Paul, did not limit the use of apostolos to eyewitnesses. . . He viewed the apostles primarily as those who were commissioned for spreading the faith. . . And Paul’s basic concept when using the word is the missionary role of church planting.”[96]
Apostolos has an evolving meaning in the New Testament. As was suggested, it goes through four general phases: Phase One: The Twelve- chosen by Jesus as His special witnesses of His Ministry from His baptism to His ascension; Phase Two: After Jesus ascension, their “training” had been completed, and they filled the office of the apostle. Their mission was to initiate and spread the Gospel Commission Jesus gave in Matt. 28, especially to the Jews; Phase Three: was seen in the ministry and office of Paul and his companions, in taking the gospel to the Gentiles, and planting churches throughout Asia and Asia Minor; Phase Four: represented a shift from an office to a spiritual gift. As delineated in 1 Cor. 12 and Eph. 4, the gift of apostle is gender inclusive, and based on an inner calling from God to a ministry of His choosing. “Apostles include men and women and children called and sent by God to fulfill the Great Commission through planting churches in pioneer areas.”[97] Therefore, it is not gender or age specific, but Spirit inspired and commissioned.
Reflections
Our understanding of the on-going role of apostles has several implications for our mission work in the modern church. The following application of the New Testament “Gift of Apostles” is worth noting:
1) Present day missionaries who proclaim the gospel and plant churches where Christ is not known, fulfill the same function as missionary apostles in the New Testament. While not all overseas ministry is apostolic in this sense, missions in every generation should prioritize this foundational role of apostles.
2 ) Mission work should develop with apostles as the base because they are God’s gift to lay the foundation of the church. Mission practice that is not built on apostles will likely have an inadequate foundation.
3 ) Apostles come from the churches, but the New Testament emphasizes that churches come from apostles.
4 ) The biblical model for the partnership of established churches with the work of apostles includes commissioning and releasing those who are called by God, hearing and affirming reports of what God is doing in pioneer areas, contributing to the financial support of apostles working in foreign lands.
5 ) When we view the apostle concept in terms of a spiritual gift fulfilled in a function, rather than an ecclesiastical office- we understand that “Apostleship” is not tied to a status, but to a task.[98]
Footnotes [1] Doug Batchelor, (Taken from An open letter from Doug Batchelor regarding the response to his sermon) Women’s Ordination:
A Biblical Prospective” On February 6, 2010, I presented a message to my home church in Sacramento, California. While Jesus engaged women to share the gospel, He called only men to serve in the capacity of apostle. When Judas died, his replacement was chosen from among men (Mark 3:14; Acts 1:21). This is just the beginning of the evidence.” http://www.womenministrytruth.com/portals/7/documents/An-Open-Letter-From-Pastor-Doug-Batchelor.pdf
Stephen Bohr--“Who intentionally chose 12 male apostles when there were women able in ministry that could have been chosen as well? Who chose to place the names of 12 males on the gates of the New Jerusalem and 12 males on the foundations of the city?” http://secretsunsealed.org/Downloads/newsletter2Q12web.pdf
Randy Roberts--“And Junia was identified by Paul as a leading apostle. Women filled every leadership role you can imagine.” http://session.adventistfaith.org/roberts-edited
[2] In the textus receptus
[3] Plat. Ep., VII, 346a; referenced in Kittel, Ibid, p. 407
[4] Kittel, Ibid, p. 407
[5] Kittel, Ibid, p. 407
[6] Kittel, Ibid, p. 407
[7] Kittel, Ibid, p. 409
[8] Kittel, Ibid, 411
[9] Kittel, Ibid, 411
[10] Don Dent, The Ongoing Role of Apostles in Missions: The Forgotten Foundation, p. 31
[11] Karl Rengstorf, “Apostello, exapostello, apostolos, pseudapostolos, apostole.” TDNT, ed. Gerhard Kittle, 1:398-446
The word appears four times in the New Testament (Acts 1:25; Rom. 1:5; 1 Cor. 9:2; Gal. 2:8)
[12] W.E. Vine; Expository Dictionary of N.T. Words
[13] Hermann Cremer, Biblico-Theological Lexicon of the New Testament
[14] Joseph H. Thayer; Thayer’s Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament
[15] S. Bagster, The Analytical Greek Lexicon
[16] Walter Bauer, Greek-English Lexicon
[17] Edward Robinson, Greek and English Lexicon of the New Testament
E.W. Bullinger; Critical Lexicon and Concordance to the English and Greek N.T. George Berry; Greek-English Lexicon
[18] Hermann Cremer, Biblico-Theological Lexicon of the New Testament
[19] George Abbott-Smith, A Manual Greek Lexicon of the New Testament
[20] Henry George Liddell & Robert Scott; A Greek-English Lexicon
[21] Samuel C. Loveland; A Greek Lexicon: Adapted to the N.T.: with English Definitions
[22] Frederick William Danker, The Concise Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament
[23] Samuel C. Loveland; A Greek Lexicon: Adapted to the N.T.: with English Definitions
[24] S. Bagster, The Analytical Greek Lexicon
[25] Alexander Souter; A pocket Lexicon to the Greek N.T.
[26] George Abbott-Smith, A Manual Greek Lexicon of the New Testament
Theologian Gerhard Kittel has noted- “Only occasionally in the Gk. Field does apostolos have a meaning related or apparently related ot that which it bears in the NT. . . In the older period apostolos is one of the special terms bound up with sea-faring, and more particularly with military expeditions; it almost a technical political term in this sense.”
(Gerhard Kittel, Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, Vol. 1, p. 407)
[27] In the older period apostolos is one of the special terms bound up with sea-faring, and more particularly with military expeditions; it almost a technical political term in this sense. (Gerhard Kittel, Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, Vol. 1, p. 407)
[28] Throughout the NT the word is used only of men, although according to the course of things women might also have been called apostles. Yet this would have been a self-contradiction, since it is a legal term and women have very restricted legal competence in Judaism. (Kittel, Ibid, p. 421)
[29] Kittel, Ibid, 422
[30] John 17:21,25
[31] John 17:6
[32] John 17:4
[33] John 14:9
[34] Heb. 2:18
[35] Dent, Ibid, p. 34
[36] Matt. 10:2
[37] EG White, Desire of Ages, 291
[38] Luke 9:2
[39] Luke 9:2
[40] Luke 9:2
[41] Luke 9:6
[42] Mark 3:14
[43] Acts 1:22
[44] Acts 3:14
[45] Acts 3:14
[46] Mathias replaced Judas- Acts 1:25,26
[47] Acts 4:31
[48] Dent, Ibid, p. 37
[49] W. Bauer, Gr./Eng. Lexicon of the N.T.
[50] Abbott-Smith, Gr. Lexicon of the N.T., Thayers, Gr..Eng. Lex. Of the N.T., E.W. Bullinger, Critical Lexicon & Concordance to the Greek N.T., Henry Liddell & Robert Scott, Greek English Lexicon
[51] Cremer, Biblico-Theological Dict. Of Gr. N.T.
[52] Ed. Robinson, Gr. & Eng. Lexicon of the N.T., Frederick Danker, Concise Gk/Eng. Lex. Of the N.T.
[53] Tyro’s Greek/English Lexicon
[54] S. Bagster, Analytical Gr. N.T., W. Perschbacher, New Analytical Greek Lexicon
[55] Abbott-Smith, Liddell & Scott, Ibid
[56] Thayers, Ibid
[57] Abbott-Smith, Robinson, Cremer, Perschbacher, Bullinger
[58] Tyro, Abbott-Smith, Robinson, Cremer, Thayer, Perschbacher, Danker
[59] Thayer, Ibid
[60] Danker, Ibid
[61] Bagster, Ibid
[62] Bauer , Ibid
[63] Desire of Ages, 291
[64] Desire of Ages, 290
[65] The exception is when Paul is mentioned. The Definite article is used for him as well.
[66] 1 Thess 1:1 identifies Paul, Silvanus and Timothy as the authors of 1 Thessalonians.
1.2. The man identified as Silvanus (Greek = Silouanos) in 1 Thess 1:1 as one of the authors of the letter is the same man known as Silas (Silas) in the Book of Acts. This is obvious from the fact that the movements of "Silvanus" in Paul's letters (1 Thess 1:1; 2 Thess 1:1; 2 Cor 1:19; see 1 Pet 5:12) coincide with those of "Silas" in the Book of Acts (Acts 15:22, 27, 32 (34), 40; 16:19, 25, 29; 17:4, 10, 14, 15; 18:5). This man's given name was Silas, which was a Jewish name (see Josephus, War 2.520; 3.11, 20; Ant. 14.40; 18.204; Life 89-90, 272; t. Ber. 2.10); he took a similar sounding Roman name, Silvanus, presumably in order to facilitate his evangelistic work. http://www.abu.nb.ca/courses/ntintro/1thess.htm
[67] Dent, Ibid, p. 39
[68] Dent, Ibid, p. 39
[69] Rom. 1:1; 11:13; 1 Cor. 1:1, 9:1,2; 2 Cor. 1:1; Gal. 1:1; Eph. 1:1; Col. 1:1; 1 Tim. 1:1; 2:7; 2 Tim. 1:1,11; Tit. 1:1
[70] RH 5/11/11
[71] 1 Ti. 2:7; 2 Ti. 1:11
[72] The Review and Herald, May 11, 1911
“Paul regarded his ordination as marking a new epoch in his life. From this time he afterward dated the beginning of his apostleship.” (Trials to Triumph, 87)
[73]1 Cor. 1:1; 2 Cor. 1:1; Gal. 1:1; Eph. 1:1; Col. 1:1; 1 Ti. 1:1; 2 Ti 1:1; Tit. 1:1
[74] Rom. 11:13
[75] 1 Cor. 9:
[76] 1 Cor. 15:9
[77] 2 Cor. 11:5- “most eminent” most likely referring to the Twelve Apostles.
[78] It was not to exalt self, but to magnify the grace of God, that Paul thus presented to those who were denying his apostleship, proof that he was “not a whit behind the very chiefest apostles.” 2 Corinthians 11:5. Those who sought to belittle his calling and his work were fighting against Christ, whose grace and power were manifested through Paul. The apostle was forced, by the opposition of his enemies, to take a decided stand in maintaining his position and authority. (AA 388)
[79] Rom. 1:5
[80] 1 Cor. 9:2
[81] Gal. 2:8
[82] Acts 4:36 and 9:27
[83] F.F. Bruce, Paul: Apostle of the Heart Set Free, 12
[84] Silas and Timothy according to Col. 1:23.
[85] Dent, Ibid, p. 53
[86] Ellen G. White, Acts of the Apostles, p. 91, 92
[87] Dent, Ibid, p. 64
[88] Dent, Ibid, p. 64
[89] Ellis, E. Earle, “Paul and his co-workers,” p. 445
[90] Crag S. Keener, Gift and Giver, p. 105
[91] Dent, Ibid, p. 58
[92] Harold Hoehner, “Ephesians, An Exegetical Commentary,” p. 541
[93] Craig S. Keener, Gift and Giver, p. 128
[94] Anthony Thiselton, The First Epistle to the Corinthians: A Commentary on the Greek Text, p. 1014
[95] David E. Garland, 2 Corinthians, p. 59
[96] Dent, Ibid, p. 5
[97] Dent, Ibid, p. 6
[98] Adapted from Dent, Ibid, p. 64,65
Why Johnny won’t read the Bible: postmodernism and the decline of Christian literacy
Associate Professor of English Literature at Southwestern Adventist University Karl G. Wilcox gives a lecture at Andrews University Oct. 2012 on postmodernism and the decline of Christianity. The lecture was part of a symposium put together by the Center for Secular and Postermodern Studies (CSPS), which is a department of the Office of Adventist Mission at the General Conference. If you haven't heard of CSPS, here is its mission and general information:
Mission
To inspire, mentor, and equip Seventh-day Adventist pastors, churches and organizations to successfully lead seculars and postmoderns into a real experience with God.
General Information
CSPS exists to help the Seventh-day Adventist church better understand secular and postmodern people, explore new evangelistic methods and provide practical, relevant tools to make disciples through a real experience with God.
La Sierra University's Edward C. Allred Center honors notorious abortionist
Edward C. Allred made a fortune owning a chain of abortion clinics, personally aborting hundreds of thousands of fetuses, and currently owns gambling venues in California and New Mexico. In 2010, La Sierra University founded the “Edward C. Allred Center for Financial Literacy and Entrepreneurship" in his honor.
It hardly seems possible that La Sierra University, which still purports to be a Seventh-day Adventist school, would name anything after a man who has left such a trail of wreckage in his wake, a man who made his fortune eliminating two generations of humanity, and now spends his days devising ways to separate gamblers from their money. And yet they did. But apparently they are not proud to be associated with his life work, as shown by the misleading information on their website:
Dr. Allred has always been an entrepreneur, whether in his innovative and financially successful medical practice or in his lifelong commitment to the sport and business of quarter horse racing in the United States and Southern California in particular. To both he has brought not only sound and creative business practices but also a deep interest in his colleagues and employees and a genuine care for their well being.
To characterize a business with annual revenues of $70 million from 23 outlets in two states as a “medical practice” goes beyond spin and crosses over into dissimulation.
In 1969, Dr. Edward C. Allred, a graduate of La Sierra University and Loma Linda University, founded the “Avalon-Slauson Medical Group,” which was later renamed “Family Planning Associates.” Although this was before the Supreme Court effectively legalized abortion nationwide in Roe v. Wade (1973), California had already legalized abortion in several situations, and hence many women traveled to California to have abortions. “We had planeloads of people coming in,” recalled Allred to a Los Angeles Times reporter in 2002, “We'd meet them at the airport with a bus.”
In 1980, Allred claimed to have personally aborted a quarter of a million fetuses in the preceding 12 years. It may seem difficult to believe that one man could perform so many abortions, but Allred tried to spend no more than five minutes with each pregnant woman. “We've been pioneers in so many ways,” he once told a reporter. “We streamlined, we made efficiencies, we employed the suction technique better than anyone, and we eliminated needless patient-physician contact. We usually see the patient for the first time on the operating table and then not again.” Spending only five minutes per patient would have allowed Allred to perform as many as 100 abortions in a 10-12 hour working day, and 200 working days per year (50 four-day work weeks) would, over 12 years, add up to 240,000 aborted fetuses. So Allred's estimate of the number of abortions he performed during that time is credible.
You might wonder how a person who has aborted a very large city worth of human lives salves his conscience. The pioneers of abortion, such as Margaret Sanger, were quite explicit in favoring it as a means of weeding out undesirables and the unfit, and there was general agreement that the black race was undesirable. Dr. Allred has, at least on one occasion, voiced similar thoughts.
Population control is too important to be stopped by some right-wing pro-life types. . . . The Aid to Families with Dependent Children program is the worst boondoggle ever created. When a sullen black woman of 17 or 18 can decide to have a baby and get welfare and food stamps and become a burden to all of us, it's time to stop. In parts of South Los Angeles, having babies for welfare is the only industry the people have. Edward C. Allred, M.D. quoted in Anthony Perry, "Doctor's Abortion Business is Lucrative," San Diego Union, October 12, 1980, pages A-3 and A-14.
Family Planning Associates expanded to the point where Allred owned 21 abortion clinics in California and two in Chicago. According to a 2001 article in Forbes Magazine, Allred's business generated $70 million in annual gross revenues and $5 million in annual profits. Just as McDonald's founder Ray Kroc pioneered efficiencies and economies of scale in the hamburger business, Edward C. Allred pioneered efficiencies in the abortion clinic business, causing some to call Allred “the Ray Kroc of abortions.”
But things did not always go smoothly; there have been post-abortion deaths, and Allred has been sued many times. One abortion technique Allred used in the early days was saline amniocentesis--injecting saline in place of the normal amniotic fluid--which slowly poisons the baby while burning its skin. This method was usually used in late-term abortions, and the baby typically took an hour to 90 minutes to die. In 1977, Gianna Jessen's 17-year-old mother went to Dr. Allred's Avalon Clinic in Inglewood, California, seeking to abort a pregnancy of 29 weeks (seven months). Dr. Allred used the salt poisoning method, underestimating the amount of saline necessary to kill the fetus, which began struggling to escape the deadly womb. Gianna Jessen was born alive, and Dr. Allred is listed on her birth certificate as the doctor who delivered her. Gianna suffers from cerebral palsy, which she calls the gift of cerebral palsy, and today has become a prominent spokeswoman in the pro-life movement.
Dr. Allred sold Family Planning Associates in 2005, and has retired from the abortion business. He devotes his time to a hobby and passion he acquired while still in medical school: horse racing. Dr. Allred now owns Los Alamitos Race Track in Cypress, California, and Ruidoso Downs, in New Mexico. Horse racing is a very dangerous “sport,” and the exploitation of jockeys is one of the most under reported aspects of that “sport” (really just an excuse for gambling).
Jockeys are independent contractors who earn on average about $38,000 per year; for a basic “mount fee” of as little as $60.00 per race, they risk death and paralysis. In a typical year, at least one or two jockeys are killed or suffer catastrophic spinal cord injuries, and yet the tracks do not carry adequate insurance. A paralyzed jockey will typically burn through a million dollars in medical bills in the first 2 years after the accident. This isn't a theoretical concern; on September 2, 2011, Jacky Martin suffered a broken neck in a fall at Ruidoso Downs, is now a quadriplegic, and needs mechanical help to breathe. Ruidoso downs reportedly carries only $500,000 in accident insurance, and, as in almost every case of this type, that is grossly inadequate to provide for Jacky Martin's ongoing medical needs.
These men and women risk death an catastrophic injury almost solely to provide an occasion for gambling. At Los Alamitos, the daily “handle,” or total dollar amount of bets taken in, was reported to be $1.3 million. Allred decided to simulcast Los Alamitos races to other venues, thus enabling gamblers to bet and lose money on races that they did not attend. Ruidoso Downs had been losing money, but Allred and his partners made the track profitable by adding 300 slot machines, some of which are proudly shown on the track's website. Attendance at horse racing venues has sharply declined in recent years, and industry insiders say the “sport” cannot survive without casino-style gaming at the tracks. But is saving the tracks in the public's interest? According to the National Gambling Impact Study Commission (NGISC), more than one in three racetrack patrons is a pathological or problem gambler, so the tracks cause financial problems for the patrons, as well as causing jockeys to risk death and quadriplegia.
Back to La Sierra University. The Board of Directors is stocked with Adventist Church leaders. Pacific Union president Ricardo Graham is Chairman of the Board of Trustees, and all the affiliated conference presidents within the Pacific Union are also board members. These are all decent men, so it is difficult to understand how they could have allowed La Sierra to become associated with such a person as Edward C. Allred. This sad incident, along with previous stories—such as the issuing of tax-free bonds that came with a secularizing bond covenant, and the ongoing failure to prevent Darwinism being inculcated as truth—call into question whether the Board of Trustees is exercising any meaningful oversight at all.
If the church leadership in the region cannot reform La Sierra, world church leadership must take action. If La Sierra cannot be reformed, it must be clearly and publicly separated from the official church.
[AUDIO] Persecution good for the church?
Liberty magazine editor Lincoln E. Steed was a guest speaker at the Beaumont Seventh-day Adventist Church in Beaumont, Calif. His theme was perhaps it's not so bad for us to be persecuted after all.
Liberty Magazine is freely circulated among legislators and individuals in positions of influence and highly respected and appreciated by people of all persuasions. Only about 10,000 Adventists, out of about one million in the North American Division, subscribe to Liberty, and according to Steed, 185,000 magazines are sent out each year.
[audio http://advindicate.com/audio/religiosliberty.mp3]
(If your current browser does not support HTML5 audio, or Flash Player is not installed, a direct download link will be displayed instead of the player.)
Coming to grips with evil
On Friday, December 14, 2012 a young man pushed his way into a Connecticut elementary school and coldly murdered twenty six people. Twenty of them had never reached the age of eight. After one hour of evil, many will spend days, weeks, months, and years in grieving. All of us are challenged to confront evil itself. What can we do, personally and as a society, to protect ourselves from the destruction caused by evil?
As a society, we have tried to detect and imprison evil. We have removed those that seem evil from out of society. We have removed many perpetrators of evil from out of our lives. But evil still haunts us. We have achieved phenomenal accomplishments in engineering, in the arts, and in scientific discovery. A trip half way around the globe is now less stressful and time consuming than a trip over the hills and through the woods to grandma’s house used to be. But we have not achieved similar results in containing and eradicating evil. It is still present, revealing itself at random moments, reminding us of our helplessness to conquer it.
All of the tools available to society may partially contain evil, but cannot eradicate it, for we can never force evil out of another person’s heart. The battle against evil is ultimately an individual battle. It is fought daily. It involves personally learning to recognize what is really good and what is not. It demands intellectual rigor to pierce the confusion and lies that still swirl around us for the purpose of protecting evil. It involves challenging the status quo and what seems normal, for our status quo offers us a means of survival while we accommodate evil. It is a “normal” that integrates evil with good.
The unconverted heart enjoys at least some evil, until it reaps its due reward. For the shooter of Newtown, there may have been a euphoric sense of power and control. For those of us who take our friends and family for granted, the pleasure of the movie we were watching or the friend we were commiserating with was temporarily more satisfying than expressing love and gratitude to someone close to us. We like evil, until we experience its downside.
The only way to eradicate evil is to remove it from each human heart. As long as it hides beneath the surface, it will find opportunities to highjack the human it resides in and destroy people.
And there is only one means of having personal victory over evil. It is the discovery of Jesus. Not the chanting of His name or the repetition of His titles. Not the attachment to a mythical persona. But the real appreciation of Him.
Let us stand figuratively in the shadow of His death and look at His life. Watch His nobility as He recognizes and actively provides comfort for his own mother and for women He passes along the way without asking for the least sympathy for the injustice and suffering of His impending execution. Earlier, He did not flinch when they took up stones to murder Him, but He weeps at the moral suicide committed by these “champions of morality” who are really a showcase of evil. He sees the leaders destroying their society, blaming anyone but themselves for their own evil conduct, and it breaks His heart. He cries with the fatherless, the powerless, and the widows. He helps the homeless, the disheartened, and those in the prison created by social stigma. His behavior stands faultless, throughout the record. He demonstrates love, compassion, moral courage, dignity, responsibility, determination, restraint, and all other virtues.
Look at the Person who was haunted by every evil imaginable, but refused to permit the first evil thought to linger in His heart. All of the evil that surrounded Him was never used as an excuse to permit any evil to come from Him. He took personal responsibility for refusing to say or do anything evil. Jesus never blamed anyone, or saw any circumstance as a justification for evil.
As we look at the most noble Person our world has ever witnessed, we will naturally see ourselves as individuals that have tolerated, accommodated, and even perpetrated evil in this world. Each of us has contributed to a world with evil. Some of us have given the world a double portion of that evil. Others have simply done nothing to conquer evil, feeling proud that we are not top contributors. But evil doesn’t need big donors only. Any contribution will do. And all of us have given at least our spare change.
Looking at the courage and the nobility of Jesus, we recognize that He and we cannot get along as long as any evil gets in the way. Each of us can be friends with Jesus only if we drop the evil, all of it.
At its root, every thought and every act of evil is not only an injustice or harm to some creature but an equal injustice to our Creator as well. We need Jesus to forgive us. We need pardon. We need to be saved and changed. This reconciliation is the only real remedy in the universe for evil. It is an individual solution. No one can experience it for another. It is a real and effective solution. It is a gratifying and thrilling solution. It is the answer to evil, all evil.
The cruel history of December 14, 2012 ought to drive us to a personal daily determination to look at Jesus, to resolve every difference between our sinful selves and His perfection. We ought to take that one December day’s horrible events as a reminder to pursue an evil-free life at any personal cost.
When we delay and dally with evil, we embrace it and provide it credibility and traction. As we tolerate evil, we become personally responsible for its existence. We have just witnessed in Newtown, Connecticut, a victory of evil in the day-to-day battle. Let us take courage and renew that day-to-day battle so that evil’s momentary achievement will be lost in resounding defeat. Let evil’s temporary win in the battle strengthen our commitment, and let us increase our resolve to be victorious in the war.
Unity equates to dirty nails
The term unity flies around liberally these days. Another widely referenced term is equality. These terms are linked together on a regular basis intimating they are similar. In fact, they are not evenly matched, as there are many distinctions between these two words, one of which is the focus. Equality means just that – equal. If I have equal pieces of pie I have at least two pieces of pie with the same weight, size, ratio of crust to filling, dollop of whip cream, etc. The focus is on the items being compared. People often associate equality with an ideal situation; this is not always true. Parts of a healthy body are not equal, but rather thrive in a perfectly balanced, unified environment. This balance provides harmony of movement and direction and outlines the summative foundation for health, which is to focus on the whole, not on individual organs or functions. If the heart – as important as it is – demanded the same treatment as the brain the result would be fatal for the entire body.
Another evident difference between the two words is that equality compares internally and unity looks outward. Equality by its very nature requires internal comparison. Comparison seeks to attach measurements and values. This naturally leads to identifying levels of values, which lends to labeling one thing more desirable and another less desirable. Paul understood the folly of internal comparison when he wrote, “For we dare not class ourselves or compare ourselves with those who commend themselves. But they, measuring themselves by themselves, and comparing themselves among themselves, are not wise” (2 Corinthians 10:12). Matthew Henry’s (2002) commentary on this verse identifies the reality supported by scholarly studies (Dovidio & Fiske, 2012; Silvia, 2012) that biases play a key role in observations and as a result our judgments are shaped by the labels of the world around us rather than truth alone. This is fodder for error and cannot be the mode of operation of a Godly individual or organization.
However, for those who are quick to throw equality out with the bath water it must play a vital role in Christianity:
The secret of unity is found in the equality of believers in Christ. The reason all division, discord, and difference is found in separation from Christ. Christ is the center to which all should be attracted; for the nearer we approach the center, the closer we shall come together in feeling, in sympathy, in love, growing into the character and image of Jesus. RH December 22, 1891
Equality is measured through the eyes of our Leader, not in comparison to each other. We do not need to compare internally – as that is God’s job alone – but rather focus on Christ and we will fulfill the plan and purpose God intends for His church.
An interesting phenomenon I have observed finds many people have no issue pointing to a group and identifying it as disjointed or unequal. Few become uncomfortable in pointing out which subsections in the group are causing inequality. Some even consistently point out individuals as disruptive. Interestingly enough, the disrupters are always outside of those who point the fingers. The fact is you and I make up “us” – you and I cause disunity. I choose to not seek Christ as the center of my life or come together with fellow believers in the image of Jesus. I choose to disrupt the body of Christ and disruption is the antithesis of unity.
The fourteenth fundamental belief of the Seventh-day Adventist church references the body of Christ and the many members that must work in unity to “serve and be served without partiality or reservation” (“Fundamental Beliefs,” 2012). Service without reservation rarely equals equality, which raises a difficult point for what place equality has in the Seventh-day Adventist church. A search for the term “equality” in multiple Bible versions (ESV, ASV, and KJV) finds one verse that holds a word that is consistently translated as equality: 2 Corinthians 8:14. Paul uses the word equality to ensure that Christians did not feel they must aim for the top to be considered valuable, but rather should seek to serve those around them to ensure the burden is equally distributed to fulfill the true purpose of Christianity.
This concept proves hard for individuals. I admit this causes my eyebrows to raise a few notches, as I am not particularly interested in putting in a lot of work without providing apparent meaning to the whole. Recently I heard a statement that caught my attention: a group cannot be corporately what it is not individually. In essence, the sum cannot make up for what is lacking in the parts. A quick deduction identifies individual effort and interest as key to the group’s success. This is where I take heart. The bottom line is that each individual must take responsibility for his or her own participation and integrity and God adds the meaning. Ellen White agrees with this assertion and provides a natural progression and fail safe when facing disunity:
Here is the only safeguard for individual integrity, for the purity of the home, the well-being of society, or the stability of the nation. Amidst all life’s perplexities and dangers and conflicting claims the one safe and sure rule is to do what God says. Education, p. 225
In applying the basic statement of individual responsibility to this quote it can be remodeled to state the following: the bottom line for the individual Christian is to only seek and do what God says and the rest will fall into place.
I am going to be transparent and share my personal experience on this topic: I do not spend sufficient time understanding what God says. I can regurgitate verses – precious few – and point to overarching promises in His word, but I do not make time to unearth the depth of knowledge or understanding of God’s word. I imagine those around me who profess Christianity understand this reality in our fast-paced world. It is very easy to broadly brush across beliefs and trending topics, but taking the time to dig and become familiar with why I believe what I believe and establish a relationship with Christ on which eternity can be built proves to be more difficult.
The truth in God’s word has been likened to buried treasure that must be unearthed (Matthew 13:44). Working in my grandparent’s garden as a child I learned how to dig up the earth, to loosen it with the rototiller, shape it into rows, and dig holes in which to place either the seed or the young plant. This process made it very clear to me that my nails were going to be dirty at the end of the day. Not just a bit of dirt, but the imbedded kind of black dirt that takes some work to clean out with various tools. Interestingly enough, my nails were not just dirty that day. Daily watering, weeding, trimming, and general care produced dirty fingernails for a prolonged period of time from spring to early fall. At times I wondered if the dirt would ever be loosened. As much as I admittedly disliked gardening as a child, this intimate knowledge with the garden allowed me to navigate the bushy plants and many trees with ease and bring my visiting friends to their favorite food without delay. The caked dirt provided evidence of my activity – the more active the labor the more ingrained the dirt. Today I look at my proverbial Christian nails and I see very little dirt.
Let’s bring this home. A hot topic in the Seventh-day Adventist church is equality and unity. Applying the thought process delineated so far in this article it can be said each individual in the church must continually dig for what God says, continually get dirt under the nails. If I see few – if any – dirty fingernails at the end of my hands this means I am causing disunity in my church because I am not pulling my weight as a member of the body of Christ. Dirty fingernails means turning to God’s word and applying it in conversation, action, and in all perplexing topics rather than pure emotion, individual opinion, and popular streams of thought. This does not give us permission to go around inspecting everyone’s digits, but rather this means we need to make sure our nails hold as much dirt as possible. This is our only responsibility. If each of us looks to our own nails we will soon recognize that our little patch of unearthed treasures will grow and will meet up with others who are digging around us and before we know it the church will be unified in purpose and understanding and the conversation of equality will fade away.
A simple progression becomes clear by following the breadcrumbs as identified in the previous quote from the book Education: individuals do not seek God through His word and understand who He is, therefore the family does not join together as a unit to seek His will, which results in society consisting of nominal and face-value Christians, leaving our nation and ultimately our world filled with selfish, egocentric individuals. It always comes back to the individual. The disunity in our homes, society, nation, and yes, our denomination, comes back to me. The reason we are not unified and feel the need to exact equality is due to our individual lethargy and desire to do everything else but dig deep in the living Word for truth.
The good news is that I am an individual. I can change my understanding, my family, my society, my nation, my world, and my denomination through the grace of Christ. I plan to get dirt under my nails continually to learn about that grace, draw near to Christ, and be a Christian. I invite you to join me in this quest for unity.
References
Dovidio, J. F. & Fiske, S. T. (2012). Under the radar: How unexamined biases in decision-making processes in clinical interactions can contribute to health care disparities. American Journal of Public Health, 102(5), 945-952. Fundamental beliefs. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.adventist.org/beliefs/fundamental/index.html
Henry, M. (2002). Matthew Henry’s Concise Commentary on the Whole Bible. Peabody, Massachusetts: Hendrickson Publishers, Inc.
Silvia, J. E. (2012). The biases that limit our thinking about the economic outlook and policy. Business Economics 47(4), 297-301.
The new gnosticism
The New Gnosticism, or the Conspiracy Mongers
Conspiracy theories have always been around. I first encountered them as a teenager. Allow me to confess that I went through a phase where I was attracted to conspiracy theories. Around age 14, I read and was quite enthusiastic about a book titled None Dare Call it Conspiracy. In high school, I firmly believed there was a conspiracy to kill John F. Kennedy, and wrote a senior term paper arguing that there were two shooters at Dealey Plaza on November 22, 1963. (I have since learned more about evidence, and have repented of my naïve, teenage views.)
There is a conventional list of secret organizations that forms the architecture of all conspiracy theories; the “usual suspects” include the Knights Templars, the Illuminati, the Freemasons, the Jesuits, the Bilderbergers, the Trilateral Commission, the Federal Reserve, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Skull & Bones Society (Yale), the Bohemian Grove, and the Belizean Grove (a female counterpart to the Bohemian Club). (A recent addition was an outfit known as “the Priory of Sion,” featured in the books Holy Blood, Holy Grail and The Da Vinci Code. But, alas, the Priory of Sion has been exhaustively debunked as a hoax; it never actually existed as depicted in those novels.)
Typically, international Jewry is the villain at the center of conspiracy theories. The famous antisemitic literary hoax, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, is an archetype of the genre, taught as truth in public schools in Nazi Germany and still a bestseller in the Muslim world today. Given its ongoing popularity, Protocols is probably the most noteworthy piece of conspiracy-mongering in human history. A few years ago, international communism was frequently featured as the villain of conspiracy theories, but even in communism's heyday it was usually depicted as merely a tool of, or a front for, international Jewry.
In Seventh-day Adventist circles, the basic conspiratorial architecture—the Illuminati, the Freemasons, etc.—remains the same but, in place of the Jews, the Papacy is cast in the role of villain, and the Jesuits are the secret agents who run the world behind the scenes. A book I recently perused claimed that the Jesuits were “the secret terrorists” who were behind every assassination of a U.S. President, and were even behind the sinking of the Titanic. This same author has another book arguing that the “black pope” (the “general” of the Society of Jesus) rules the world, that Jesuits control the U.S. Presidency, that the Jesuits have planned all the wars of the 20th Century, etc.
Another popular (in Adventist circles) conspiracy theorist argues that the religion of Islam is the creation of the Catholic Church, that Saddam Hussein died in 1999, four years before an American-led invasion of Iraq was launched to remove him from power, that the logos of all major sports teams worldwide include occult symbolism, that the European identity card, when turned upside down, depicts the goat of Mendes a Satanic symbol, and that the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, was actually an inside job in which the buildings were pre-wired with explosives (making this person a “9/11 Truther,” as proponents of this all-too-common conspiracy theory have come to be known).
What is the appeal of conspiracy theories? If well presented, as in the novel Holy Blood, Holy Grail, conspiracy theories are quite entertaining, yet I have found genuine history to be more entertaining. The real appeal of conspiracy theories is the desire for, and pride in, secret knowledge. Conspiracy theorists are a contemporary echo of a 2nd Century heresy known as Gnosticism. The Gnostics believed that the material world was evil, and that esoteric knowledge was the way of salvation from this evil world. Knowledge of facts hidden to most others was, to the Gnostic (from the Greek gnostikos, meaning “learned”), the path to liberation.
Conspiracy theories seem harmless to many, but they are anything but harmless. There are a number of very real dangers awaiting those who embrace conspiracy theories, including the following:
Where's the Love?
If I have the gift of prophecy and can understand all secrets and every form of knowledge, and if I have absolute faith so as to move mountains but have no love, I am nothing. 1 Cor. 13:2
Conspiracy theories typically have not been innocent speculation. They have often been used to incite hatred against those who are said to be running things behind the scenes, typically the Jews. Actual violence, and even mass slaughter, has sometimes resulted from the promotion of conspiracy hoaxes such as The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. When we Adventists present our interpretations of Bible prophecy, we need to do so in love. We want to communicate love for Roman Catholics, many of whom are sincere Christians who are following all the truth that they know. We do not not want to incite hatred or unreasonable fear of Catholics. When we present Bible prophecy, we point out, with sadness, that the known facts of history show that the Roman Church answers the biblical description of the “little horn” in Daniel. It is not a close case; there is no need to add shaky or disputable “facts,” or conspiracy theories, in a misguided attempt to bolster the case, which brings me to my next point.
Gilding the Lily
A conspiracy-mongering filmmaker has uploaded to YouTube.com a video entitled “The Jay-Z Deception,” claiming that rapper “Jay-Z” (Shawn Corey Carter, b. 1969) is a Freemason. Our filmmaker claims that Mr. Carter has titled his albums, “Blueprint” “Blueprint2” and “Blueprint3” to correspond with the degrees of Freemasonry he has achieved. The three horizontal lines on the album cover for “Blueprint3” are said to represent the Egyptian trinity of Ptah, Ra, and Amun (also known as Osiris, Isis and Horus). The initiation rite of the 9th degree of Freemasonry involves an apron depicting a decapitation in which a sword is held in the the right hand and a severed head in the left hand. Our filmmaker argues that the beheading of Nick Berg in Iraq in 2004 was carried out exactly as depicted on the Freemason apron, and was a signal to all Freemasons and Illuminatists to begin to bring about the New World Order.
If these wild accusations are true, what should we do? What could we do in response? Well, it would be a good idea not to listen to Shawn Carter's “music” or watch his videos. But does anyone really need to believe that Mr. Carter is a Freemason in order to want to avoid his “creative output”? I think not. Here are the lyrics (just the first verse and the chorus) to Mr. Carter's “Is that Yo Bitch":
[Lyrics have been removed.]
And who could forget Mr. Carter's classic, “Nigga What, Nigga Who?” in which he glorifies gun violence and murdering anyone who snitches to the police:
[Lyrics have been removed.]
The rest of Mr. Carter's oeuvre is along these same lines, rapping about “niggaz,” drugs, gangs, murder, “bitches,” etc.
I cannot imagine that anyone would think Shawn Carter's output of obscenity, filth, and crude sex references would be acceptable if only he weren't a Freemason. Asserting that Mr. Carter is a Freemason is an instance of “gilding the lily,” which, idiomatically, means to make a superfluous addition to something that is already complete. The case for avoiding Mr. Carter's work is complete upon a quick survey of his lyrics, which are utterly unfit for any civilized human being, much less a Christian. Who cares whether he has ties to secret organizations? Why promote a disputable conspiracy theory about him when that which anyone can easily verify shows him to be far beyond the pale of Christian entertainment?
Studying what is not uplifting
Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good report; if there be any virtue, and if there be any praise, think on these things. Philippians 4:8
Conspiracy theories are to be avoided for the same reason that the rap of Shawn Carter is to be avoided: it is unedifying even when it is not soiling, which it almost always is. To get deeply involved with studying evil is damaging to one's spiritual health. It is interesting that Ellen White acknowledged the existence of secret societies, and, in the strongest possible terms, warned Christians not to join them, but she never wanted to explore in detail what they were up to. To the contrary:
“I have been permitted to look in upon these secret societies, their feasts, their order, their works, and my prayer has been, ‘Hide them from my sight forever. Let me not understand more.’ One thing I do know, that those who remain in connection with them will be burned up with the bundles of tares, one with them in the last day. Manuscript Releases, vol. 20, p. 286
“Let me not understand more,” she said. Why? Because studying the deeds of darkness is not the best way to triumph in one's spiritual quest. To the contrary, we are to study Jesus Christ and His works of love and mercy. That is the spiritual food that will best nourish us on our pilgrim journey. It is enough to know that we are not to join secret societies, on pain of eternal death; there is no need to try to tease out their hidden, occult purposes, or speculate as to what crimes they may have caused to be committed in the past. To do so is to dwell on darkness.
Demoralization
Like the original Gnostics, who believed that all matter was evil, the new Gnostics believe that practically all states, institutions and organizations are Satanically (or Jesuitically) controlled, including—as some Adventist conspiracy mongers strongly hint—the Seventh-day Adventist Church. This has the effect of discouraging those who swallow the conspiracy theories. After all, what point is there in striving to vindicate truth, to keep God's church on the right track, when unseen forces control matters behind the scenes, and our efforts are doomed in advance?
The truth is that not all institutions are Satanically controlled. All human institutions are tainted by human sin, but that is far different from saying that everything is run by the adversary. There are limits on Satan's power. Satan in not self-existent (Ezek. 28:15), he cannot read our thoughts (Dan. 2; Mat. 4), he is not omnipresent, he is not omnipotent, and he is not the sovereign of the universe. Those who are in Christ can overcome Satan (1 John 2:13-14; Rev. 12:11) whose days are numbered (Rom. 16:20). Demonic powers cannot separate us from God’s love in Christ (Rom. 8:37-39), and Christ has assured us that the powers of hell will not gain control of His church (Mat. 16:18).
Although Satan is not in control of the Seventh-day Adventist Church, through the Jesuits or otherwise, there is a struggle over its character and the direction it will take. Many “cultural Adventists” would like to see the church jettison some or all of its distinctive doctrines and become just another evangelical Christian denomination. Others would like to see doctrine de-emphasized altogether, and subordinated to social welfare-type charitable outreach. If our Church is to continue to pursue its historic commission of heralding the soon return of Jesus Christ to earth and calling the world to worship on the day God hallowed and set aside as a memorial to His creative act, then we will need every believing Adventist at his post of duty. Moreover, we must not be demoralized by phantom conspiracies, indulging a fatalistic pessimism that the battle is already lost, the outcome determined by secret conspiracies. To the contrary, we must stand at our battle stations energized, knowing that the issue is not decided and our part may be crucial.
Bad politics
There is indeed a struggle over the direction of the Seventh-day Adventist Church. As with all polities of any significant size, the Adventist Church has a right, a left, and a center, and the center determines the direction of the church, depending upon which side they align with. As with all polities, the right and the left are competing with each other for the support of this broad, non-ideological center.
When conservative Adventists embrace conspiracy mongering, it hurts us in the political struggle in the church. Liberals use the wild and unsubstantiated conspiracies to discredit the conservative doctrinal beliefs with which the conspiracy theorist is also associated. It gives the other side a weapon they can use against us, and they are using it with gusto. Just last year, a liberal publication used the conspiracy theories of one conservative evangelist to try to discredit his creationism. The argument goes like this: (1) this man believes nutty things about Saddam Hussein, the terrorist attack on the twin towers, etc., (2) he is also a young earth creationist, therefore (3) young earth creationism is just as nutty as conspiracy mongering. This is a logical fallacy, a non sequiter, and also a form of guilt by association, but it nevertheless has argumentative or rhetorical value. The stakes are too high to hand liberal, “cultural” Adventists the means by which they can marginalize and dis-empower conservative Adventists who still believe and teach the doctrines of the Church.
Putting away childish things
When I was a child, I spoke as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child; but when I became a man, I put away childish things. 1 Cor. 13:11.
Do you remember when Cracker Jack and cereal boxes came with cheap plastic toys inside? (Do they still come with toys inside?) One of my all-time favorite cheap plastic toys was the “secret decoder ring.” Conspiracy theories function intellectually like the secret decoder ring, allowing the neo-Gnostic to cut through the fog of war, the many details and complex, multiple causations of history, the welter of conflicting expert opinion, and get right to the truth of the matter. They allow him to “decode” what remains unknown and mystifying to his neighbors. In sum, conspiracy theories have an appeal that is intellectually immature. But unlike the secret decoder ring, conspiracy theories are not harmless toys. They can do real damage, most of all to the person who delves too deeply into them.
It is time for conservative, believing Adventists to signal that conspiracy theories are not, or are at least no longer, an acceptable part of any evangelist's, lecturer's, or filmmaker's toolkit. It is time to put conspiracy theories away, along with the other relics of childhood and adolescence.
The narrow road of faith and the two ditches on either side (Part II)
While the fanatical belief that God will always heal us if we have enough faith is a ditch on one side of the straight and narrow path, an extension of this “ditch” is the fanaticism of presumption which is based on the erroneous idea that God will only work through natural means and miracles but not through the care of the physician. Consider the extreme beliefs of Breatharianism. These individuals believe that one of God’s eight doctors, sunshine, can provide them all that is necessary for life.
Read More
